Pembrolizumab (8) – Keytruda®

Melanoma, adjuvant therapy

Characteristics

Start date 01.04.2019 – Marketing authorisation: 12.12.2018
Resolution 19.09.2019
Limitation date 01.04.2024 limitation repealed
INN Pembrolizumab
Brand name Keytruda®
Pharm. company MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH
G-BA Procedure ID D-446
ATC code L01FF02 PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors (L01FF)
ICD-10 codes (AIS) C43.0Malignant melanoma of lip, C43.1Malignant melanoma of eyelid, including canthus, C43.2Malignant melanoma of ear and external auricular canal, C43.3Malignant melanoma of other and unspecified parts of face, C43.4Malignant melanoma of scalp and neck, C43.5Malignant melanoma of trunk, C43.6Malignant melanoma of upper limb, including shoulder, C43.7Malignant melanoma of lower limb, including hip, C43.8Malignant melanoma of overlapping sites of skin, C43.9Malignant melanoma of unspecified site of skin
Alpha-ID codes (AIS) I111156Malignant melanoma of the hairy scalp, I111633Malignant melanoma of the ear and external auditory canal, I18282Malignant melanoma, I18791Malignant melanoma of the eyelid, I3412Malignant melanoma of the lip, I3416Malignant melanoma of the face, I96395Malignant melanoma of the trunk n.c, I96441Malignant melanoma of the upper extremity n.c, I96442Malignant melanoma of the lower extremity n.c
DDD 9.5 mg P
Therapeutic area Oncological diseases Melanoma (MA)
Reason for procedure New therapeutic indication
Specialty Bundling Special practice conditions

Therapeutic indication of the resolution

KEYTRUDA as monotherapy is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adults with Stage III melanoma and lymph node involvement who have undergone complete resection.

Subpopulation Indication Comparator
A) Monotherapy indicated for adjuvant treatment of melanoma in tumour stage III with lymph node involvement after complete resection in adults Observational waiting

Studies and Results

No. of studies
(best subpopulation)
1 (Keynote-054)
Study design
(best subpopulation)
H2H vs. ACT
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation)
no

  • Clinical trials
    • The benefit assessment is based on the results of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled KEYNOTE-054 trial.

Adult patients with stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection, for adjuvant treatment

  • There is an indication for a non-quantifiable additional benefit for pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection in adults.
  • Overall, therefore, an indication is derived regarding the certainty of the established additional benefit.
  • mortality
    • overall survival
    • According to the study protocol, no analysis of the overall survival endpoint was planned at the time of the first and second data cut-offs in the KEYNOTE-054 study.
    • At the time of the first data cut-off, 25 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 35 patients in the placebo arm had died.
  • Morbidity – Recurrences/Recurrence-free survival
    • Recurrences
    • For the recurrence endpoint, a statistically significant advantage of pembrolizumab compared with watchful waiting was observed at the time of the second data cut-off (relative risk (RR): 0.63; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54; 0.74]; p-value < 0.001). 30.7% of patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 48.7% in the placebo arm had experienced a recurrence by the time of the second data cut-off.
    • Recurrence-free survival
    • With regard to the endpoint of recurrence-free survival, a statistically significant advantage was observed with pembrolizumab treatment (hazard ratio (HR): 0.56; [95% CI: 0.44; 0.72]; p < 0.001). In the pembrolizumab arm, the median time to event had not yet been reached, whereas in the control arm it was 21.7 months.
    • Overall, therefore, with regard to the endpoints of recurrence and recurrence-free survival, there is a clear, clinically relevant advantage of pembrolizumab compared with watchful waiting.
    • However, as the follow-up period (median 21.6 months) at the 2nd data cut-off is relatively short and not long enough to adequately reflect the high-risk period for the occurrence of a recurrence—3 years after the primary diagnosis—the extent of this advantage cannot be clearly quantified based on the available data.
  • Morbidity – Symptoms (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    • In the KEYNOTE-054 study, disease symptoms are assessed using the symptom scales of the cancer-specific questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30.
    • In line with the comments on the assessment of symptoms using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the analyses presented are considered unusable.
  • quality of life
    • Data on disease-related quality of life are collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales (overall health status, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning and social functioning).
    • In line with the comments on the assessment of symptoms using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the analyses provided are considered unusable.
  • Side effects – Total adverse events (AEs)
    • The results for the endpoint ‘Total Adverse Events’ are presented for supplementary purposes only.
    • In the pembrolizumab arm, 93.3% of patients experienced an adverse event, compared with 90.2% of patients in the placebo arm.
  • Overall assessment / Conclusion
    • Data on morbidity, quality of life and side effects are available for the assessment of the additional benefit of pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection in adults.
    • However, as the follow-up period (median 21.6 months) at the 2nd data cut-off is relatively short and not long enough to adequately reflect the high-risk period for recurrence, which is 3 years after the primary diagnosis, the extent of this advantage cannot be clearly quantified based on the available data.
    • The analyses presented by the pharmaceutical manufacturer regarding symptoms, as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, and regarding health status, as measured using the EQ-5D VAS, are classified as unusable.
    • Accordingly, the analyses of the health-related quality of life endpoint, as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, are also considered unusable.
    • In the category of side effects, there are significant disadvantages due to an increase in serious adverse events, severe adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events.
    • In the overall assessment of the results for all available patient-relevant endpoints, the present adjuvant treatment scenario shows clear positive effects—albeit not clearly non-quantifiable in terms of extent—with regard to the prevention of recurrence, which are offset by relevant disadvantages relating to side effects.
    • Overall, pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection is found to provide a non-quantifiable additional benefit.
  • Overall assessment / Conclusion
    • Data on morbidity, quality of life and side effects are available for the assessment of the additional benefit of pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection in adults.
    • However, as the follow-up period (median 21.6 months) at the 2nd data cut-off is relatively short and not sufficiently long to adequately reflect the high-risk period for recurrence, which is 3 years after the primary diagnosis, the extent of this advantage cannot be clearly quantified based on the available data.
    • The analyses presented by the pharmaceutical manufacturer regarding symptoms, as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, and health status, as measured using the EQ-5D VAS, are classified as unusable.
    • Accordingly, the analyses of the health-related quality of life endpoint, as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, are also considered unusable.
    • In the category of side effects, there are significant disadvantages due to an increase in serious adverse events, severe adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events.
    • In the overall assessment of the results for all available patient-relevant endpoints, the present adjuvant treatment scenario shows clear positive effects – albeit not clearly non-quantifiable in terms of extent – with regard to the prevention of recurrence, which are offset by relevant disadvantages relating to side effects.
    • Overall, pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement following complete resection is found to provide a non-quantifiable additional benefit.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures

Pembrolizumab (41) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1 per cent, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, in combination with radiotherapy with or without concomitant cisplatin therapy 2,550–4,240 86% Hint for minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (40) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Malignant pleural mesothelioma, non-epithelioid, first-line treatment, in combination with pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy 55–105 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (38) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Cervical carcinoma (stage III to IVA), first-line, combination with radiochemotherapy 750 100% Indication of non-quantifiable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (39) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Endometrial carcinoma, first-line, combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel 1,370–3,330 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (36) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Urothelial carcinoma, non-resectable or metastatic, first-line, combination with enfortumab vedotin 1,050–2,601 39% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (37) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Breast cancer, triple-negative, high risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy 2,440–2,610 50% Indication of minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (35) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung cancer, high risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, monotherapy or combination with platinum-based chemotherapy 5,090–6,780 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (34) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung cancer, adjuvant therapy with high risk of recurrence after resection, after prior chemotherapy 2,690–3,200 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (32) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1, HER2, first-line, combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy 285–2,613 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (33) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Biliary tumours, first-line, combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin 1,480–2,180 100% Indication of minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (31) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1, HER2+, first-line, combination with trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy 70–710 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (28) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Cervical carcinoma, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1 (CPS), combination with or without bevacizumab 1,315–1,525 40% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (30) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Melanoma, ≥ 12 to < 18 years 1–4 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (22) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), adjuvant, monotherapy, pre-treated patients 1,518–1,973 100% Hint for minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (23) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Colorectal cancer (CRC)) with MSI-H or with dMMR, after fluoropyrimidine-based combination therapy. 350–1,470 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (24) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Endometrial carcinoma with MSI-H or with dMMR, pre-treated 230–3,360 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (25) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Gastric carcinoma with MSI-H or dMMR, pre-treated 80–110 74% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (26) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Small bowel carcinoma with MSI-H or dMMR, pre-treated 40–380 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (27) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Biliary carcinoma with MSI-H or dMMR, pre-treated 20–150 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (29) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Melanoma, adjuvant therapy, ≥ 12 years, monotherapy 1,621–2,314 100% Indication of non-quantifiable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (21) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Breast carcinoma (BC), triple-negative (TNBC), high risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy 0
2,440–2,520
50% Hint for minor additional benefit repealed
Pembrolizumab (19) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Endometrial carcinoma (EC) , after platinum-based therapy, combination with lenvatinib 1,130–5,070 100% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (20) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), first-line, combination with lenvatinib 2,790–4,189 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (17) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, PD-L1 expression ≥ 10 (CPS), first-line, combination with platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. 535–805 34% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (18) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Breast cancer (BC), triple-negative, PD-L1 expression ≥ 10 (CPS), combination with chemotherapy 260–270 50% Hint for considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (14) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), pre-treated patients, ≥ 3 years 120–240 46% Hint for considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (16) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Urothelial carcinoma (UC), CPS ≥ 10, first-line 225–380 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (15) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with MSI-H or dMMR, first-line 370–955 87% Hint for minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (12) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), first-line, combination with axitinib 3,500 23% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (13) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Squamous cell carcinoma head and neck, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%, first-line, combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy 4,950–5,370 100% Indication of minor additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (11) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Squamous cell carcinoma head and neck, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%, first-line, monotherapy 4,955–5,370 100% Hint for considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (10) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), squamous cell histology, first-line, combination with carboplatin and (nab-) paclitaxel 5,340–5,570 71% Hint for considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (9) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), non-squamous cell histology, first-line, combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy 8,020–9,120 100% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (8) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Melanoma, adjuvant therapy 2,670–3,400 100% Indication of non-quantifiable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (7) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Urothelial carcinoma (UC), CPS ≥ 10, first-line 0
240–420
100% additional benefit not proven repealed
Pembrolizumab (6) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Squamous cell carcinoma head and neck 470–3,290 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (5) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Urothelial carcinoma (UC) 0
2,300–3,300
61% Indication of considerable additional benefit repealed
Pembrolizumab (4) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) 60–180 100% additional benefit not proven
Pembrolizumab (3) Keytruda® MSD SHARP & DOHME GMBH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), first-line 4,000 100% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (2) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), after prior chemotherapy 12,500–24,300 40% Indication of considerable additional benefit
Pembrolizumab (1) Keytruda® MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH Oncological diseases Melanoma 2,500–4,500 71% Indication of considerable additional benefit


<< List of all resolutions