Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), first-line, combination with lenvatinib
Characteristics
Start date
15.12.2021
–
Marketing authorisation:
15.11.2021
Resolution
07.07.2022
INN
Pembrolizumab
Brand name
Keytruda®
Pharm. company
MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH
G-BA Procedure ID
D-763
ATC code
L01FF02
PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors (L01FF)
ICD-10 codes (AIS)
C64Malignant neoplasm of kidney, except renal pelvis
Alpha-ID codes (AIS)
I19876Renal cell carcinoma
DDD
9.5
mg
P
Therapeutic area
Oncological diseases
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Reason for procedure
New therapeutic indication
Specialty
Bundling
Combination therapy
Therapeutic indication of the resolution
Keytruda, in combination with lenvatinib, is indicated for the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in adults
Subpopulation
Indication
Comparator
a)
Adults with non-pretreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a favourable risk profile (IMDC score 0)
Pembrolizumab in combination with Axitinib
b)
Adults with non-pretreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma with intermediate (IMDC score 1-2) or unfavourable risk profile (IMDC score ≥ 3)
- Avelumab in combination with axitinib (only for patients with an unfavourable risk profile) or
– Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab or
– Pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib
Studies and Results
No. of studies
(best subpopulation)
1
(CLEAR)
Study design
(best subpopulation)
H2H vs. non-ACT + ITC (Bucher)
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation)
no
Reason for dividing into subpopulations (G-BA)
Disease stage
Clinical trials
In the KEYNOTE 426 trial, pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib was compared with sunitinib. The trial included adults with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
a) Adults with previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma with a favourable risk profile (IMDC score 0)
An additional benefit is not proven.
A key prerequisite for an adjusted indirect comparison is the assumption of sufficient similarity between the studies. This includes similarity of the patient population; however, this could not be adequately assessed in the present evaluation, as relevant data on the relevant patient populations from the CLEAR and KEYNOTE 426 trials are not available.
Overall, based on the available data, it cannot be established with sufficient certainty that the patient populations are sufficiently similar for the indirect comparison.
Consequently, no suitable data are available for assessing the additional benefit of pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib in patient group a).
b) Adults with untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma with an intermediate (IMDC score 1–2) or unfavourable risk profile (IMDC score ≥ 3)
The additional benefit is not proven.
A key prerequisite for an adjusted indirect comparison is the assumption of sufficient similarity between the studies. This includes similarity of the patient population; however, this could not be adequately assessed in the present evaluation, as relevant data on the relevant patient populations from the CLEAR and KEYNOTE 426 trials are not available.
Overall, based on the available data, it cannot be established with sufficient certainty that the patient populations are sufficiently similar for the indirect comparison.
Consequently, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib in patient group b).
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.