Mepolizumab (3) – Nucala®
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.12.2021 – Marketing authorisation: 12.11.2021 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 19.05.2022 |
| Limitation date | 01.12.2022 limitation repealed |
| INN | Mepolizumab |
| Brand name | Nucala® |
| Pharm. company | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-746 |
| ATC code | R03DX09 Other systemic drugs for obstructive airway diseases (R03DX) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | J32.0Antritis (chronic), J32.1Frontal sinusitis NOS, J32.2Chronic ethmoidal sinusitis, J32.3Sphenoidal sinusitis NOS, J32.4Pansinusitis NOS, J32.8Sinusitis (chronic) involving more than one sinus but not pansinusitis, J32.9Sinusitis (chronic) NOS, J33.0Choanal polyp, J33.1Woakes´ syndrome or ethmoiditis, J33.8Accessory polyp of sinus, J33.9Nasal polyp, unspecified |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I5131Chronic rhinosinusitis, I5132Chronic maxillary sinusitis, I5137Chronic frontal sinusitis, I5139Chronic ethmoid sinusitis, I5142Chronic sphenoid sinusitis, I5144Chronic pansinusitis, I5145Chronic rhinosinusitis with exacerbation, I5152Nasal cavity polyp, I7751Nasal polyp, I79149Paranasal sinus polyp, I85887Polyposis nasi deformans |
| DDD | 3.6 mg P |
| Therapeutic area | Respiratory system diseases Chroinic rhinitis / rhinosinusitis (CRS) |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Specialty | Bundling ACT change |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Nucala is indicated as an add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) for whom therapy with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery do not provide adequate disease control. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery. | Dupilumab or omalizumab, each in combination with intranasal corticosteroids (budesonide or mometasone furoate). |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
1 (SYNAPSE) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
H2H vs. non-ACT + no ITC |
|
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation) |
no |
| ACT change | 19.05.2022 – Neuer wissenschaftlicher Kenntnisstand |
- Clinical trials
- The SYNAPSE trial is a randomised, double-blind Phase III trial comparing mepolizumab with placebo, in an add-on design to maintenance therapy with intranasal mometasone furoate.
Adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery
- For adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery, the additional benefit of mepolizumab as an add-on therapy compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
- To demonstrate the additional benefit of mepolizumab, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has submitted the results of the double-blind, randomised SYNAPSE study, including analyses at week 52.
- As the SYNAPSE study does not provide data in comparison with the currently defined appropriate comparator therapy, the study cannot therefore be used to establish the additional benefit of mepolizumab.
- mortality
- No deaths occurred in the SYNAPSE study up to week 52.
- morbidity
- For the symptomatic endpoints (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and loss of the sense of smell, each assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS)), the proportion of patients showing an improvement of ≥ 1.5 points at week 52 showed a statistically significant advantage in favour of mepolizumab + mometasone furoate compared with placebo + mometasone furoate (nasal obstruction VAS: RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.75; 0.98] p-value = 0.022; nasal discharge VAS: RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.75; 0.98] p-value = 0.022; loss of sense of smell VAS: RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.57; 0.95] p-value = 0.007).
- With regard to the impact of the disease on daily activities, the SYNAPSE study shows a statistically significant advantage in favour of mepolizumab + mometasone furoate compared with placebo + mometasone furoate. However, the 95% confidence interval for the standardised mean difference (Hedges’ g) does not lie entirely outside the irrelevance range of −0.2 to 0.2. It cannot therefore be concluded that the observed effect is clinically relevant.
- Avoiding, in particular, repeat surgery for nasal polyps following an initial operation is a key therapeutic objective, partly due to procedure-specific complications. In the present indication, the endpoint of nasal polyp surgery (NP surgery) is, in principle, a patient-relevant endpoint. There are differing views on the suitability of the operationalisation of the endpoint used in the present study.
- Health-related quality of life
- Health-related quality of life was assessed in this study using the SF-36. For the SF-36, the physical composite score (PCS) and the mental composite score (MCS) are considered separately. For the SF-36, a statistically significant difference in favour of mepolizumab + mometasone furoate compared with placebo + mometasone furoate was observed (15% of the scale range) by week 52, a statistically significant advantage in favour of mepolizumab + mometasone furoate compared with placebo + mometasone furoate (PCS: RR 0.55 [95% CI 0.39; 0.76] p-value < 0.001; MCS: RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.47; 0.99] p-value = 0.03).
- Side effects
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment arms for the endpoints of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuation due to AEs.
- Overall assessment
- Overall, therefore, the additional benefit is not proven and the resolution is limited to 1 December 2022.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Mepolizumab (6) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | COPD | n.d. | active procedure | |
| Mepolizumab (4) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis | 80–1,130 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (3) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | 10,500–12,600 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (5) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Hypereosinophilic syndrome | 100–400 | 100% Hint for considerable additional benefit | |
| Mepolizumab (2) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Bronchial asthma, ≥ 6 to < 18 years | 2,200–3,500 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (1) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Bronchial asthma | 16,000–100,000 | 50% Hint for minor additional benefit |
<< List of all resolutions