Mepolizumab (2) – Nucala®
Bronchial asthma, ≥ 6 to < 18 years
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.10.2018 – Marketing authorisation: 27.08.2018 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 22.03.2019 |
| INN | Mepolizumab |
| Brand name | Nucala® |
| Pharm. company | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-390 |
| ATC code | R03DX09 Other systemic drugs for obstructive airway diseases (R03DX) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | J45.0, J45.1, J45.8, J45.9Other and unspecified asthma |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I16367Bronchial asthma, I5235Predominantly allergic bronchial asthma, I5238Non-allergic bronchial asthma, I5245Mixed form of bronchial asthma |
| DDD | 3.6 mg P |
| Therapeutic area | Respiratory system diseases Asthma |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Specialty | ACT change Combination therapy |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Nucala is indicated as an add-on treatment for severe refractory eosinophilic asthma in adults, adolescents and children aged 6 years and older. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Children and adolescents aged ≥ 6 to < 18 years with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma | Continuation of the optimised therapy of severe asthma according to stage 5 of the NVL Asthma 2018 and additionally escalation with omalizumab, provided that the criteria necessary for the use of omalizumab are fulfilled. |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
3 (MENSA, MUSCA, SIRIUS) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
Evidence transfer |
|
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation) |
no |
| ACT change | 11.12.2018 – Aktualisierung der Leitlinien (EBM) |
- Clinical trials
- The MENSA trial is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase III trial with a 32-week treatment duration.
- The randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase III SIRIUS trial enrolled 135 patients aged 12 years and over (including 2 adolescents) with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma were enrolled; at the time of enrolment, they were already receiving regular treatment with oral (systemic) corticosteroids (OCS) in addition to high-dose ICS and a further control medication.
- The single-arm, open-label COSMOS study is a joint follow-up study of the MENSA and SIRIUS trials.
- The COSMEX study is a follow-up to the COSMOS study, which enrolled 339 patients with life-threatening or severe debilitating asthma who had demonstrated clinical benefit following prior treatment with mepolizumab.
- In the single-arm, open-label OSMO study, 145 patients aged 12 years and over (including 2 adolescents) with severe eosinophilic asthma were treated with mepolizumab over a period of 32 weeks.
- Study 200363 is a single-arm, open-label Phase II study of mepolizumab, which exclusively enrolled children aged ≥ 6 to < 12 years with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Children and adolescents aged ≥ 6 to < 18 years with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- For this reason, the G-BA concludes that additional benefit from mepolizumab is not proven for children and adolescents aged ≥ 6 to < 18 years with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma.
- Overall, only very few adolescents and no children were included in the comparative studies submitted (MENSA, MUSCA and SIRIUS).
- Extrapolating the results from adult patients to paediatric patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma is fraught with considerable uncertainty due to differences in pathogenesis and the resulting suitability of omalizumab as an appropriate escalation option.
- Due to the significant uncertainties mentioned above, it is not possible to perform evidence transfer from the results of adults in the directly comparative studies MENSA, SIRIUS and MUSCA to adolescents and children.
- The data presented are therefore not suitable for determining any additional benefit of mepolizumab for children and adolescents aged ≥ 6 to < 18 years with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Mepolizumab (6) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | COPD | n.d. | active procedure | |
| Mepolizumab (4) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis | 80–1,130 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (3) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | 10,500–12,600 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (5) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Hypereosinophilic syndrome | 100–400 | 100% Hint for considerable additional benefit | |
| Mepolizumab (2) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Bronchial asthma, ≥ 6 to < 18 years | 2,200–3,500 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Mepolizumab (1) | Nucala® | GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG | Bronchial asthma | 16,000–100,000 | 50% Hint for minor additional benefit |
<< List of all resolutions