Lisocabtagen maraleucel (4) – Breyanzi®
Mantle cell lymphoma, following ≥ 2 prior treatments
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.12.2025 – Marketing authorisation: 21.11.2025 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 04.06.2026 |
| INN | Lisocabtagen maraleucel |
| Brand name | Breyanzi® |
| Pharm. company | Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-1279 |
| ATC code | L01XL08 OTHER ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS (L01X) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | C83.1Centrocytic lymphoma |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I111242Mantle cell lymphoma |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Regulatory status | ATMP |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Breyanzi is used to treat adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) following at least two lines of systemic therapy, including a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Erwachsene mit rezidiviertem oder refraktärem Mantelzell-Lymphom (MCL) nach mindestens zwei Linien einer systemischen Therapie, einschließlich eines Bruton-Tyrosinkinase (BTK)- Inhibitors |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- The completed TRANSCEND-NHL-001 trial is a single-arm, open-label, multicentre Phase I trial investigating the efficacy and tolerability of lisocabtagen maraleucel.
Adults with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) following at least two lines of systemic therapy, including a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor
- An additional benefit is not proven.
- Consequently, additional benefit from lisocabtagen maraleucel for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma is not proven following at least two lines of systemic therapy, including a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor.
- The TRANSCEND-NHL-001 study submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer does not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy due to its single-arm design and is therefore not suitable for assessing additional benefit.
- MAIC analyses against aggregated study arms are generally not considered appropriate in the context of benefit assessment.
- Overall assessment
- For the assessment of the additional benefit of lisocabtagen maraleucel, the pharmaceutical manufacturer submitted the results of the single-arm TRANSCEND-NHL-001 study.
- The results of the single-arm TRANSCEND-NHL-001 study are not suitable for assessing additional benefit, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- Overall, the indirect comparisons are not suitable for providing proof of additional benefit over the appropriate comparator therapy.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
<< List of all resolutions