Lisocabtagen maraleucel (3) – Breyanzi®
Follicular lymphoma, following ≥ 2 prior treatments
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.04.2025 – Marketing authorisation: 12.03.2025 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 02.10.2025 |
| INN | Lisocabtagen maraleucel |
| Brand name | Breyanzi® |
| Pharm. company | Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-1196 |
| ATC code | L01XL08 OTHER ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS (L01X) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | C82.0Follicular lymphoma grade I, C82.1Follicular lymphoma grade II, C82.2Follicular lymphoma grade III, unspecified, C82.3Follicular lymphoma grade IIIa, C82.4Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb, C82.7, C82.9Follicular lymphoma, unspecified |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I116042Follicular lymphoma grade 1, I116043Follicular lymphoma grade 2, I116044Follicular lymphoma grade 3, I116045Follicular lymphoma grade 3a, I116046Follicular lymphoma grade 3b, I116049Other types of follicular lymphoma, I17968Follicular lymphoma |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Breyanzi is used to treat adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) following two or more lines of systemic therapy. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Erwachsene mit rezidiviertem oder refraktärem follikulärem Lymphom nach mindestens zwei Linien einer systemischen Therapie |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- The ongoing TRANSCEND FL trial is a single-arm, open-label, multicentre Phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of lisocabtagen maraleucel.
Adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma following at least two lines of systemic therapy
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- Consequently, additional benefit from lisocabtagen maraleucel for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) is not proven.
- In the absence of direct comparative studies of lisocabtagen maraleucel against the appropriate comparator therapy, the pharmaceutical manufacturer cites the Phase II TRANSCEND FL study and the CA082-092 study as evidence of additional benefit.
- Due to its single-arm design, the TRANSCEND FL study submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer does not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy and is therefore not suitable for assessing additional benefit.
- MAIC analyses against aggregated study arms are generally not considered appropriate in the context of benefit assessment.
- Overall, the indirect comparisons are not suitable for providing proof of additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- Overall assessment
- For the assessment of the additional benefit of lisocabtagen maraleucel, the pharmaceutical manufacturer submitted the results of the single-arm TRANSCEND FL study.
- The results of the single-arm TRANSCEND FL study are not suitable for assessing additional benefit, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- Overall, the indirect comparisons are not suitable for providing proof of additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
<< List of all resolutions