Lisocabtagen maraleucel (3) – Breyanzi®

Follicular lymphoma, following ≥ 2 prior treatments

Characteristics

Start date 15.04.2025 – Marketing authorisation: 12.03.2025
Resolution 02.10.2025
INN Lisocabtagen maraleucel
Brand name Breyanzi®
Pharm. company Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA
G-BA Procedure ID D-1196
ATC code L01XL08 OTHER ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS (L01X)
ICD-10 codes (AIS) C82.0Follicular lymphoma grade I, C82.1Follicular lymphoma grade II, C82.2Follicular lymphoma grade III, unspecified, C82.3Follicular lymphoma grade IIIa, C82.4Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb, C82.7, C82.9Follicular lymphoma, unspecified
Alpha-ID codes (AIS) I116042Follicular lymphoma grade 1, I116043Follicular lymphoma grade 2, I116044Follicular lymphoma grade 3, I116045Follicular lymphoma grade 3a, I116046Follicular lymphoma grade 3b, I116049Other types of follicular lymphoma, I17968Follicular lymphoma
Therapeutic area Oncological diseases
Reason for procedure New therapeutic indication

Therapeutic indication of the resolution

Breyanzi is used to treat adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) following two or more lines of systemic therapy.

Subpopulation Indication Comparator
Erwachsene mit rezidiviertem oder refraktärem follikulärem Lymphom nach mindestens zwei Linien einer systemischen Therapie

Studies and Results

  • Clinical trials
    • The ongoing TRANSCEND FL trial is a single-arm, open-label, multicentre Phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of lisocabtagen maraleucel.

Adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma following at least two lines of systemic therapy

  • The additional benefit is not proven.
  • Consequently, additional benefit from lisocabtagen maraleucel for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) is not proven.
  • In the absence of direct comparative studies of lisocabtagen maraleucel against the appropriate comparator therapy, the pharmaceutical manufacturer cites the Phase II TRANSCEND FL study and the CA082-092 study as evidence of additional benefit.
  • Due to its single-arm design, the TRANSCEND FL study submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer does not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy and is therefore not suitable for assessing additional benefit.
  • MAIC analyses against aggregated study arms are generally not considered appropriate in the context of benefit assessment.
  • Overall, the indirect comparisons are not suitable for providing proof of additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • Overall assessment
    • For the assessment of the additional benefit of lisocabtagen maraleucel, the pharmaceutical manufacturer submitted the results of the single-arm TRANSCEND FL study.
    • The results of the single-arm TRANSCEND FL study are not suitable for assessing additional benefit, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
    • Overall, the indirect comparisons are not suitable for providing proof of additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures



<< List of all resolutions