Trifluridin / Tipiracil (3) – Lonsurf®
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.04.2020 – Marketing authorisation: 25.04.2016 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 01.10.2020 |
| INN | Trifluridin/Tipiracil |
| Brand name | Lonsurf® |
| Pharm. company | Servier Deutschland GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-535 |
| ATC code | L01BC59 Pyrimidine analogues (L01BC) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | C18.0Malignant neoplasm of ileocecal valve, C18.1Malignant neoplasm of appendix, C18.2Malignant neoplasm of ascending colon, C18.3Malignant neoplasm of hepatic flexure, C18.4Malignant neoplasm of transverse colon, C18.5Malignant neoplasm of splenic flexure, C18.6Malignant neoplasm of descending colon, C18.7Malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon, C18.8Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of colon, C18.9Malignant neoplasm of large intestine NOS, C19Malignant neoplasm of rectosigmoid junction, C20Malignant neoplasm of rectum |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I104488Malignant neoplasm of the rectosigmoid junction, I115345Carcinoma of the colon and sigmoid colon, I18119Malignant neoplasm of the rectum, I25671Malignant neoplasm of the flexura coli sinistra, I29955Malignant neoplasm of the colon, I29956Malignant neoplasm of the caecum, I29957Malignant neoplasm of the vermiform appendix, I29959Malignant neoplasm of the ascending colon, I29964Malignant neoplasm of the flexura coli dextra, I29966Malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon, I29971Malignant neoplasm of the descending colon, I29972Malignant neoplasm of the sigmoid colon |
| DDD | 45 mg O |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases Colorectal cancer (CRC) / Small intestine cancer |
| Reason for procedure |
Reassessment: G-BA limitation
Original resolution: Trifluridin / Tipiracil (1) (02.02.2017) |
| Specialty | Special practice conditions |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Lonsurf is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have been previously treated with, or are not considered candidates for, available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-EGFR agents. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have already been treated with, or are not suitable for, available therapies. These therapies include fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents. | Best-Supportive-Care |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
2 (RECOURSE, TERRA) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
H2H vs. ACT |
|
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation) |
yes |
- Clinical trials
- The RECOURSE trial is an international, randomised, double-blind Phase III trial in which trifluridine/tipiracil was directly compared with placebo, and best standard care (BSC) formed part of the treatment in both treatment groups.
- The TERRA trial is a double-blind RCT conducted in Asia to compare trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC with placebo + BSC.
Adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have already been treated with available therapies or who are unsuitable for these. These therapies include fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, as well as anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents.
- For adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have already been treated with available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents, or who are not suitable for these, there is a hint of a minor additional benefit.
- Although a meta-analysis of two studies is available, for these reasons the certainty of the evidence (probability of additional benefit) for the overall conclusion on additional benefit is classified as a hint.
- mortality
- The meta-analysis of the RECOURSE and TERRA studies shows a statistically significant prolongation of overall survival with treatment using trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC compared with BSC.
- Taking into account the advanced stage of the disease and treatment, the extension in survival time achieved is assessed as a relevant improvement, though one that does not go beyond a minor extent.
- morbidity
- Symptoms were not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- The meta-analysis shows a statistically significant prolongation of PFS for treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC compared with BSC.
- The PFS endpoint is a composite endpoint comprising endpoints from the categories of mortality and morbidity.
- Morbidity was assessed not primarily on the basis of disease symptoms, but solely on the basis of asymptomatic findings not directly relevant to the patient.
- Health-related quality of life
- Health-related quality of life was not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- The data on health-related quality of life from the TALLISUR study are highly limited in their interpretability and cannot be used for the benefit assessment.
- Side effects
- Adverse events (with and without progression of the underlying disease) occurred at least once in almost all patients in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies; consequently, no conclusions regarding the assessment of additional benefit can be drawn from a comparison of the two study arms.
- However, in the analysis of AEs excluding events attributable to progression of the underlying disease, the RECOURSE study showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms.
- For the endpoint of discontinuation due to AEs, the meta-analysis shows a statistically significant advantage for treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil compared with BSC.
- In detail, there is a statistically significant disadvantage for trifluridine/tipiracil in terms of the specific AEs for the endpoint of myelosuppression (CTCAE grade ≥ 3), with the common manifestations of anaemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia and neutropenia; as well as a statistically significant disadvantage for trifluridine/tipiracil for the endpoint of gastrointestinal toxicity (SOC: gastrointestinal disorders), with the common manifestations of diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting.
- Overall assessment
- With regard to overall survival, treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil resulted in a prolongation of survival time compared with best supportive care; this is assessed as a relevant improvement, albeit one that does not go beyond a minor extent.
- Symptoms and health-related quality of life were not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- An overall review of the results regarding side effects reveals neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.
- In the overall assessment, a moderate – rather than merely minor – improvement in treatment-related benefit is identified, and thus a minor additional benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil compared with best supportive care is identified.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (4) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal cancer, after 2 prior therapies, combination with bevacizumab) | 3,530–6,230 | 100% Hint for considerable additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (3) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients | 6,900–12,200 | 100% Hint for minor additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (2) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Metastatic gastric cancer, pre-treated patients | 590–1,030 | 100% Indication of minor additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (1) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients |
0
6,900–12,200 |
100% Hint for minor additional benefit repealed |
<< List of all resolutions