Trifluridin / Tipiracil (3) – Lonsurf®
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.04.2020 – Marketing authorisation: 25.04.2016 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 01.10.2020 |
| INN | Trifluridin/Tipiracil |
| Brand name | Lonsurf® |
| Pharm. company | Servier Deutschland GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-535 |
| ATC code | L01BC59 Pyrimidine analogues (L01BC) |
| DDD | 45 mg O |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases |
| Reason for procedure |
Reassessment: G-BA limitation
Original resolution: Trifluridin / Tipiracil (1) (02.02.2017) |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- The RECOURSE trial is an international, randomised, double-blind Phase III trial in which trifluridine/tipiracil was directly compared with placebo, and best standard care (BSC) formed part of the treatment in both treatment groups.
- The TERRA trial is a double-blind RCT conducted in Asia to compare trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC with placebo + BSC.
Adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have already been treated with available therapies or who are unsuitable for these. These therapies include fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, as well as anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents.
- For adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have already been treated with available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents, or who are not suitable for these, there is a hint of a minor additional benefit.
- Although a meta-analysis of two studies is available, for these reasons the certainty of the evidence (probability of additional benefit) for the overall conclusion on additional benefit is classified as a hint.
- mortality
- The meta-analysis of the RECOURSE and TERRA studies shows a statistically significant prolongation of overall survival with treatment using trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC compared with BSC.
- Taking into account the advanced stage of the disease and treatment, the extension in survival time achieved is assessed as a relevant improvement, though one that does not go beyond a minor extent.
- morbidity
- Symptoms were not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- The meta-analysis shows a statistically significant prolongation of PFS for treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC compared with BSC.
- The PFS endpoint is a composite endpoint comprising endpoints from the categories of mortality and morbidity.
- Morbidity was assessed not primarily on the basis of disease symptoms, but solely on the basis of asymptomatic findings not directly relevant to the patient.
- Health-related quality of life
- Health-related quality of life was not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- The data on health-related quality of life from the TALLISUR study are highly limited in their interpretability and cannot be used for the benefit assessment.
- Side effects
- Adverse events (with and without progression of the underlying disease) occurred at least once in almost all patients in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies; consequently, no conclusions regarding the assessment of additional benefit can be drawn from a comparison of the two study arms.
- However, in the analysis of AEs excluding events attributable to progression of the underlying disease, the RECOURSE study showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms.
- For the endpoint of discontinuation due to AEs, the meta-analysis shows a statistically significant advantage for treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil compared with BSC.
- In detail, there is a statistically significant disadvantage for trifluridine/tipiracil in terms of the specific AEs for the endpoint of myelosuppression (CTCAE grade ≥ 3), with the common manifestations of anaemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia and neutropenia; as well as a statistically significant disadvantage for trifluridine/tipiracil for the endpoint of gastrointestinal toxicity (SOC: gastrointestinal disorders), with the common manifestations of diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting.
- Overall assessment
- With regard to overall survival, treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil resulted in a prolongation of survival time compared with best supportive care; this is assessed as a relevant improvement, albeit one that does not go beyond a minor extent.
- Symptoms and health-related quality of life were not assessed in the RECOURSE and TERRA studies.
- An overall review of the results regarding side effects reveals neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.
- In the overall assessment, a moderate – rather than merely minor – improvement in treatment-related benefit is identified, and thus a minor additional benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil compared with best supportive care is identified.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (4) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal cancer, after 2 prior therapies, combination with bevacizumab) | 3,530–6,230 | 100% Hint for considerable additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (3) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients | 6,900–12,200 | 100% Hint for minor additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (2) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Metastatic gastric cancer, pre-treated patients | 590–1,030 | 100% Indication of minor additional benefit | |
| Trifluridin / Tipiracil (1) | Lonsurf® | Servier Deutschland GmbH | Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), pre-treated patients |
0
6,900–12,200 |
100% Hint for minor additional benefit repealed |
<< List of all resolutions