Tezepelumab (1) – Tezspire®

Bronchial asthma (AB), ≥ 12 years

Characteristics

Start date 15.11.2022 – Marketing authorisation: 19.09.2022
Resolution 23.05.2023
INN Tezepelumab
Brand name Tezspire®
Pharm. company AstraZeneca GmbH
G-BA Procedure ID D-882
ATC code R03DX11 Other systemic drugs for obstructive airway diseases (R03DX)
Therapeutic area Respiratory system diseases
Reason for procedure Initial assessment

Studies and Results

  • Clinical trials
    • The randomised, double-blind extension study DESTINATION included patients who had completed either the NAVIGATOR study (N = 827) or the SOURCE study (N = 124).

a) Adolescents aged 12 to 17 with severe asthma that is inadequately controlled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus another medicinal product used for maintenance therapy

  • The additional benefit is not proven.
  • However, for the vast majority of patients in the low-biomarker populations, it remains unclear whether a trial of LAMA would have constituted an appropriate – and therefore, in accordance with the G-BA’s appropriate comparator therapy – escalation of treatment.
  • The appropriate comparator therapy has not been implemented in the low-biomarker populations.
  • Consequently, the results of the NAVIGATOR, PATHWAY and DESTINATION studies cannot be taken into account for the benefit assessment.

b) Adults with severe asthma that is inadequately controlled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus an additional medicinal product used for maintenance therapy

  • The additional benefit is not proven.
  • However, for the vast majority of patients in the low-biomarker populations, it remains unclear whether a trial of LAMA would have constituted an appropriate comparator therapy – and therefore, in accordance with the G-BA’s standard of care, necessary – escalation of treatment.
  • The appropriate comparator therapy has not been implemented in the low-biomarker populations.
  • Consequently, the results of the NAVIGATOR, PATHWAY and DESTINATION studies cannot be taken into account for the benefit assessment.
  • It therefore remains unclear whether treatment with dupilumab represents the appropriate, patient-specific escalation of therapy (taking prior treatment into account) for these patients.
  • The appropriate comparator therapy has not been applied in the indirect comparison of tezepelumab versus dupilumab presented here.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures

Tezepelumab (2) Tezspire® AstraZeneca GmbH Respiratory system diseases Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps 10,500–12,600 100% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit
Tezepelumab (1) Tezspire® AstraZeneca GmbH Respiratory system diseases Bronchial asthma (AB), ≥ 12 years 42,300–46,700 100% additional benefit not proven


<< List of all resolutions