Tezepelumab (1) – Tezspire®
Bronchial asthma (AB), ≥ 12 years
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.11.2022 – Marketing authorisation: 19.09.2022 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 23.05.2023 |
| INN | Tezepelumab |
| Brand name | Tezspire® |
| Pharm. company | AstraZeneca GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-882 |
| ATC code | R03DX11 Other systemic drugs for obstructive airway diseases (R03DX) |
| Therapeutic area | Respiratory system diseases |
| Reason for procedure | Initial assessment |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- The randomised, double-blind extension study DESTINATION included patients who had completed either the NAVIGATOR study (N = 827) or the SOURCE study (N = 124).
a) Adolescents aged 12 to 17 with severe asthma that is inadequately controlled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus another medicinal product used for maintenance therapy
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- However, for the vast majority of patients in the low-biomarker populations, it remains unclear whether a trial of LAMA would have constituted an appropriate – and therefore, in accordance with the G-BA’s appropriate comparator therapy – escalation of treatment.
- The appropriate comparator therapy has not been implemented in the low-biomarker populations.
- Consequently, the results of the NAVIGATOR, PATHWAY and DESTINATION studies cannot be taken into account for the benefit assessment.
b) Adults with severe asthma that is inadequately controlled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus an additional medicinal product used for maintenance therapy
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- However, for the vast majority of patients in the low-biomarker populations, it remains unclear whether a trial of LAMA would have constituted an appropriate comparator therapy – and therefore, in accordance with the G-BA’s standard of care, necessary – escalation of treatment.
- The appropriate comparator therapy has not been implemented in the low-biomarker populations.
- Consequently, the results of the NAVIGATOR, PATHWAY and DESTINATION studies cannot be taken into account for the benefit assessment.
- It therefore remains unclear whether treatment with dupilumab represents the appropriate, patient-specific escalation of therapy (taking prior treatment into account) for these patients.
- The appropriate comparator therapy has not been applied in the indirect comparison of tezepelumab versus dupilumab presented here.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Tezepelumab (2) | Tezspire® | AstraZeneca GmbH | Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | 10,500–12,600 | 100% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit | |
| Tezepelumab (1) | Tezspire® | AstraZeneca GmbH | Bronchial asthma (AB), ≥ 12 years | 42,300–46,700 | 100% additional benefit not proven |
<< List of all resolutions