Ravulizumab (5) – Ultomiris®
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seropositive
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.06.2023 – Marketing authorisation: 05.05.2023 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 07.12.2023 |
| INN | Ravulizumab |
| Brand name | Ultomiris® |
| Pharm. company | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-952 |
| ATC code | L04AJ02 IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS (L04A) |
| Therapeutic area | Nervous system diseases |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Specialty | ACT change |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- The ALXN1210-NMO-307 trial is an ongoing, single-arm, externally placebo-controlled, open-label trial of ravulizumab in adults with NMOSD, who are AQP4 antibody-seropositive and have experienced at least one relapse in the 12 months prior to study enrolment.
- The ECU-NMO-301 trial is a completed, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of eculizumab in adults with NMOSD, who are AQP4 antibody-seropositive and who have experienced at least 2 relapses in the 12 months prior to study enrolment, or at least 3 relapses within the 24 months prior to study enrolment, with at least 1 relapse in the 12 months prior to study enrolment.
Adults with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) who are anti-aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) seropositive
- For adults with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) who are anti-aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) seropositive, the additional benefit is not proven.
- Overall, therefore, there are no data available suitable for the benefit assessment of ravulizumab, meaning that additional benefit is not proven.
- In the absence of direct comparative studies against an active ingredient (INN) used in the appropriate comparator therapy, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has submitted two indirect comparisons for the benefit assessment: a comparison of individual arms from different studies of ravulizumab and eculizumab using a propensity score procedure, and a comparison of ravulizumab with both eculizumab and satralizumab via a network meta-analysis.
- In the comparison using the propensity score procedure, the methodology and approach adopted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer are inadequate. The data submitted are therefore not interpretable.
- Nor are the analyses presented from the network meta-analysis suitable for assessing the additional benefit.
- Overall, there are therefore no suitable data available for Ravulizumab compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Ravulizumab (5) | Ultomiris® | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH | Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, anti-aquaporin-4 IgG seropositive | 460–1,170 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Ravulizumab (4) | Ultomiris® | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH | Myasthenia gravis, AChR antibody+ | 800–1,200 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Ravulizumab (3) | Ultomiris® | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH | Paroxysmal hemoglobinuria, pediatric patients | 0–49 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Ravulizumab (2) | Ultomiris® | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH | Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) | 210–700 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Ravulizumab (1) | Ultomiris® | Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH | Paroxysmal hemoglobinuria | 260–700 | 100% additional benefit not proven |
<< List of all resolutions