Pralsetinib (1) – Gavreto®

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion+

Characteristics

Start date 15.12.2021 – Marketing authorisation: 18.11.2021
Resolution 16.06.2022
Limitation date 31.12.2027
INN Pralsetinib
Brand name Gavreto®
Pharm. company Roche Pharma AG
G-BA Procedure ID D-757
ATC code L01EX23 Other protein kinase inhibitors (L01EX)
DDD 0.4 g O
Therapeutic area Oncological diseases
Reason for procedure Initial assessment
Regulatory status Conditional Approval

Studies and Results

  • Clinical trials
    • To demonstrate the additional benefit of pralsetinib in the treatment of adults with Rearranged-during-Transfection (RET)-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not previously been treated with a RET inhibitor, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has submitted the results of the ARROW trial.
    • ARROW is an ongoing, international, multicentre, single-arm, open-label Phase I/II trial.
    • The IMpower132 trial is an international, multicentre, open-label Phase III trial in which adult patients with non-squamous cell NSCLC at stage IV and with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, who have not previously received any treatment for their metastatic disease.

a) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% of tumour cells; first-line treatment

  • The additional benefit is not proven.
  • The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
  • Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

b) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression < 50 % of tumour cells; first-line treatment

  • An additional benefit is not proven.
  • The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
  • Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

c) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody as monotherapy

  • An additional benefit is not proven.
  • The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW trial alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
  • Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

d) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following first-line treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy

  • The additional benefit is not proven.
  • The results of the single-arm ARROW study submitted are not, on their own, suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
  • Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

e) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); following first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, or following sequential treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody and platinum-based chemotherapy

  • An additional benefit is not proven.
  • The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
  • Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures

Pralsetinib (1) Gavreto® Roche Pharma AG Oncological diseases Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion+ 170–510 100% additional benefit not proven


<< List of all resolutions