Pralsetinib (1) – Gavreto®
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion+
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.12.2021 – Marketing authorisation: 18.11.2021 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 16.06.2022 |
| Limitation date | 31.12.2027 |
| INN | Pralsetinib |
| Brand name | Gavreto® |
| Pharm. company | Roche Pharma AG |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-757 |
| ATC code | L01EX23 Other protein kinase inhibitors (L01EX) |
| DDD | 0.4 g O |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases |
| Reason for procedure | Initial assessment |
| Regulatory status | Conditional Approval |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- To demonstrate the additional benefit of pralsetinib in the treatment of adults with Rearranged-during-Transfection (RET)-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not previously been treated with a RET inhibitor, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has submitted the results of the ARROW trial.
- ARROW is an ongoing, international, multicentre, single-arm, open-label Phase I/II trial.
- The IMpower132 trial is an international, multicentre, open-label Phase III trial in which adult patients with non-squamous cell NSCLC at stage IV and with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, who have not previously received any treatment for their metastatic disease.
a) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% of tumour cells; first-line treatment
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
- Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
b) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression < 50 % of tumour cells; first-line treatment
- An additional benefit is not proven.
- The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
- Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
c) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody as monotherapy
- An additional benefit is not proven.
- The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW trial alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
- Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
d) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following first-line treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy
- The additional benefit is not proven.
- The results of the single-arm ARROW study submitted are not, on their own, suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
- Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
e) Adults with RET-fusion-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); following first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, or following sequential treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 antibody and platinum-based chemotherapy
- An additional benefit is not proven.
- The results of the submitted single-arm ARROW study alone are not suitable for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib, as they do not allow for a comparison with the appropriate comparator therapy.
- The comparison presented is not suitable for drawing conclusions regarding additional benefit.
- Overall, therefore, there are no suitable data available for assessing the additional benefit of pralsetinib compared with the appropriate comparator therapy.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Pralsetinib (1) | Gavreto® | Roche Pharma AG | Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion+ | 170–510 | 100% additional benefit not proven |
<< List of all resolutions