Ivacaftor / Tezacaftor / Elexacaftor (6) – Kaftrio®
Cystic fibrosis (CF), combination treatment with ivacaftor, from 6 to ≤ 11 years (heterozygous for F508del and MF mutation)
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.02.2022 – Marketing authorisation: 07.01.2022 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 04.08.2022 |
| INN | Ivacaftor/Tezacaftor/Elexacaftor |
| Brand name | Kaftrio® |
| Pharm. company | Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Germany) GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-773 |
| ATC code | R07AX32 Other respiratory system products (R07AX) |
| DDD | 2 O |
| Therapeutic area | Metabolic diseases Orphan (turnover limit) |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Specialty | Bundling |
Studies and Results
- Clinical trials
- To assess the additional benefit of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA in children aged 6 to 11 years with cystic fibrosis who are heterozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene and carry a minimal-function mutation on the second allele, the pharmaceutical manufacturer submitted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial, VX19-445-116 (hereinafter referred to as Study 116).
Children aged 6 to 11 years with cystic fibrosis who are heterozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene and carry a minimal-function mutation on the second allele
- An overall analysis of the study results shows that, for the endpoints of pulmonary exacerbations, LCI2.5, BMI and BMI z-score; in the CFQ-R domains, in the categories of morbidity (respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms) and quality of life (social limitations); as well as for the endpoint of abdominal pain (PT), a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA.
- In summary, for children aged 6 to 11 years with cystic fibrosis who are heterozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene and carry a minimal-function mutation on the second allele, there is an indication of considerable additional benefit from IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, BSC.
- Overall, the certainty of the evidence for the observed additional benefit is classified as ‘indication’.
- mortality
- No deaths occurred in study 116.
- Morbidity – Pulmonary exacerbations
- For pulmonary exacerbations, there is a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- For serious pulmonary exacerbations, there was no statistically significant difference between IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC and placebo + BSC.
- Morbidity – Symptoms measured using the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire – Revised (CFQ-R)
- For the respiratory system and gastrointestinal symptoms domains, the patient version showed a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- In addition, the parent/carer version also showed a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC, whilst for the gastrointestinal symptoms domain, no statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups.
- Morbidity – forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%)
- Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), expressed as a percentage of the standardised normal value (FEV1%), was measured in Study 116 as the absolute change over 24 weeks of treatment. Here, a statistically significant difference was observed in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- There are differing views on the clinical relevance of FEV1% for patients. This does not affect the overall conclusion regarding the extent of the additional benefit.
- Quality of life – Health-related quality of life measured using the CFQ-R
- For the ‘social limitations’ domain, the patient version showed a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- For the domains of physical well-being, emotional state, body image, eating disorders and treatment burden, the patient version shows no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
- In addition, the parent/carer version also showed a statistically significant difference in the ‘body image’ domain in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- Side effects
- For the endpoints SUEs and discontinuation due to AEs, no statistically significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in either case.
- For the endpoint abdominal pain (PT), a statistically significant difference was observed in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- In the category of side effects, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms when viewed as a whole.
- Overall assessment
- No deaths occurred in Study 116.
- In the morbidity category, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC for the endpoints of pulmonary exacerbations, LCI2.5, BMI and BMI z-score, as well as the ‘Respiratory System’ and ‘Gastrointestinal Symptoms’ domains of the patient version of the CFQ-R, a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- Furthermore, a statistically significant difference in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups for the endpoints of serious pulmonary exacerbations or for the additional domain of gastrointestinal symptoms in the parent/carer version of the CFQ-R.
- In the health-related quality of life category, a statistically significant difference was observed in favour of IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA + BSC compared with placebo + BSC.
- For the domains of physical well-being, emotional state, eating disorders and treatment burden, no statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups in either version of the CFQ-R, nor in the additional domains of the parent/carer version—vitality, school difficulties and subjective health assessment.
- In the ‘side effects’ category, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms when viewed as a whole.
- In summary, for children aged 6 to 11 years with cystic fibrosis who are heterozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene and carry a minimal-function mutation on the second allele, there is a considerable additional benefit from IVA/TEZ/ELX + IVA compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, BSC.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
<< List of all resolutions