Ingenolmebutat (1) – Picato®
Actinic keratosis (AK)
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.01.2013 – Marketing authorisation: 15.11.2012 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 04.07.2013 repealed |
| INN | Ingenolmebutat |
| Brand name | Picato® |
| Pharm. company | LEO Pharma GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-046 |
| ATC code | D06BX02 Other chemotherapeutics (D06BX) |
| DDD | 1 U T |
| Therapeutic area | Skin diseases Squamous cell carcinoma |
| Reason for procedure |
Initial assessment
Repealed by: Ingenolmebutat (2) (21.02.2019) |
| Regulatory status | authorisation withdrawn by manufacturer |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Picato is indicated for the cutaneous treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis in adults. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Topical treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses in adults | Diclofenac hyaluronic acid gel (3 %) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in topical application or (surgical) cryotherapy in the treatment of single lesions. |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
1 (kein Name) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
H2H vs. non-ACT + ITC (Bucher) |
|
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation) |
no |
- Clinical trials
- The pharmaceutical manufacturer has identified studies for both ingenol mebutate gel and diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel in which the intervention therapy is compared in each case with a vehicle gel that does not contain ingenol mebutate or diclofenac, respectively.
Treatment of single lesions (non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses in adults)
- For adult patients with non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis, the additional benefit of ingenol mebutate (Picato®) compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
- An overall assessment of the results regarding mortality, morbidity, quality of life and side effects shows that ingenol mebutate offers no added benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, 3% diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel, in the treatment of non--hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses do not provide any additional benefit.
- morbidity
- With regard to the endpoint ‘complete healing rate’, the response rates in the vehicle arm of the ingenol mebutate studies range between 2.2% and 9.1%. In the hyaluronic acid-containing vehicle arm of the diclofenac-hyaluronic acid studies, the response rates range from 10.2% to 18.3%.
- With regard to the endpoint ‘partial clearance rate’, the response rates in the vehicle arm of the ingenol mebutate studies range from 6.7% to 12.1%. In the hyaluronic acid-containing vehicle arm of the diclofenac-hyaluronic acid studies, response rates range from 20.4% to 44.1%.
- As regards the results submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer for the endpoint ‘recurrence rate’ from two non-randomised comparative studies, these are descriptive presentations of the benefit of ingenol mebutate gel for this endpoint, based on a follow-up of patients from RCTs who achieved complete healing with ingenol mebutate.
- Studies with diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel relating to this endpoint were not included by the pharmaceutical manufacturer in the assessment.
- Overall assessment
- In the overall assessment of the results regarding mortality, morbidity, quality of life and side effects, ingenol mebutate shows a 3% additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel, in the treatment of non--hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses do not provide any additional benefit.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Ingenolmebutat (2) | Picato® | Leo Pharma GmbH | Actinic keratosis (AK) |
0
990,000–1,114,000 |
50% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit repealed | |
| Ingenolmebutat (1) | Picato® | LEO Pharma GmbH | Actinic keratosis (AK) |
0
1,112,000–3,253,000 |
100% additional benefit not proven repealed |
<< List of all resolutions