Ingenolmebutat (1) – Picato®

Actinic keratosis (AK)

Characteristics

Start date 15.01.2013 – Marketing authorisation: 15.11.2012
Resolution 04.07.2013 repealed
INN Ingenolmebutat
Brand name Picato®
Pharm. company LEO Pharma GmbH
G-BA Procedure ID D-046
ATC code D06BX02 Other chemotherapeutics (D06BX)
DDD 1 U T
Therapeutic area Skin diseases Squamous cell carcinoma
Reason for procedure Initial assessment
Repealed by: Ingenolmebutat (2) (21.02.2019)
Regulatory status authorisation withdrawn by manufacturer

Therapeutic indication of the resolution

Picato is indicated for the cutaneous treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis in adults.

Subpopulation Indication Comparator
Topical treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses in adults Diclofenac hyaluronic acid gel (3 %) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in topical application or (surgical) cryotherapy in the treatment of single lesions.

Studies and Results

No. of studies
(best subpopulation)
1 (kein Name)
Study design
(best subpopulation)
H2H vs. non-ACT + ITC (Bucher)
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation)
no

  • Clinical trials
    • The pharmaceutical manufacturer has identified studies for both ingenol mebutate gel and diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel in which the intervention therapy is compared in each case with a vehicle gel that does not contain ingenol mebutate or diclofenac, respectively.

Treatment of single lesions (non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses in adults)

  • For adult patients with non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis, the additional benefit of ingenol mebutate (Picato®) compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
  • An overall assessment of the results regarding mortality, morbidity, quality of life and side effects shows that ingenol mebutate offers no added benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, 3% diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel, in the treatment of non--hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses do not provide any additional benefit.
  • morbidity
    • With regard to the endpoint ‘complete healing rate’, the response rates in the vehicle arm of the ingenol mebutate studies range between 2.2% and 9.1%. In the hyaluronic acid-containing vehicle arm of the diclofenac-hyaluronic acid studies, the response rates range from 10.2% to 18.3%.
    • With regard to the endpoint ‘partial clearance rate’, the response rates in the vehicle arm of the ingenol mebutate studies range from 6.7% to 12.1%. In the hyaluronic acid-containing vehicle arm of the diclofenac-hyaluronic acid studies, response rates range from 20.4% to 44.1%.
    • As regards the results submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer for the endpoint ‘recurrence rate’ from two non-randomised comparative studies, these are descriptive presentations of the benefit of ingenol mebutate gel for this endpoint, based on a follow-up of patients from RCTs who achieved complete healing with ingenol mebutate.
    • Studies with diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel relating to this endpoint were not included by the pharmaceutical manufacturer in the assessment.
  • Overall assessment
    • In the overall assessment of the results regarding mortality, morbidity, quality of life and side effects, ingenol mebutate shows a 3% additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy, diclofenac-hyaluronic acid gel, in the treatment of non--hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses do not provide any additional benefit.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures

Ingenolmebutat (2) Picato® Leo Pharma GmbH Skin diseases Actinic keratosis (AK) 0
990,000–1,114,000
50% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit repealed
Ingenolmebutat (1) Picato® LEO Pharma GmbH Skin diseases Actinic keratosis (AK) 0
1,112,000–3,253,000
100% additional benefit not proven repealed


<< List of all resolutions