Emicizumab (2) – Hemlibra®
Hemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors
Characteristics
| Start date | 15.03.2019 – Marketing authorisation: 13.03.2019 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 05.09.2019 |
| INN | Emicizumab |
| Brand name | Hemlibra® |
| Pharm. company | Roche Pharma AG |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-426 |
| ATC code | B02BX06 Other systemic hemostatics (B02BX) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | D66Hereditary factor VIII deficiency |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I27819Hemophilia A |
| DDD | 15 mg P |
| Therapeutic area | Hematopoietic diseases Hemophilia (Hemophilia A /Hemophilia B) |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Hemlibra is indicated for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in patients with ● severe haemophilia A (congenital factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1%) without factor VIII inhibitors. Hemlibra can be used in all age groups. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| A) | Patients of all ages with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors who are eligible for routine prophylaxis. | Plasmatic or recombinant blood coagulation factor VIII preparations used as routine prophylaxis |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
2 (Haven-3, Spinart) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
H2H vs. non-ACT + ITC (Bucher) |
|
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation) |
no |
- Clinical trials
- The HAVEN 3 study is an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study with three randomised arms and one non-randomised arm.
- The SPINART study is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study comparing routine prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII preparations (Octocog alfa) with on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VIII preparations (Octocog alfa).
Patients with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors who are eligible for routine prophylaxis
- For patients with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors, the additional benefit of emicizumab as routine prophylaxis compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
- The additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is therefore not proven.
- Morbidity – number of treated bleeds
- The results of the adjusted, indirect comparison of bleeding events were taken into account to estimate the differences in annualised bleeding rates.
- These show no statistically significant differences between routine prophylaxis with emicizumab and prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII preparation, neither for all treated bleeds nor for treated joint bleeds.
- However, these data on bleeding rates allow conclusions to be drawn solely regarding morbidity.
- Furthermore, no usable data are available for the quality of life category, for other morbidity endpoints, or for mortality.
- Conclusion
- It is not possible, on the basis of the data presented, to weigh up any additional benefit or less benefit against the appropriate comparator therapy; consequently, no additional benefit over and above the appropriate comparator therapy can be inferred.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Emicizumab (3) | Hemlibra® | Roche Pharma AG | Moderate haemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors, with severe bleeding phenotype | 220–240 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Emicizumab (2) | Hemlibra® | Roche Pharma AG | Hemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors | 2,000 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Emicizumab (1) | Hemlibra® | Roche Pharma AG | Hemophilia A | 100 | 50% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit |
<< List of all resolutions