Emicizumab (2) – Hemlibra®

Hemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors

Characteristics

Start date 15.03.2019 – Marketing authorisation: 13.03.2019
Resolution 05.09.2019
INN Emicizumab
Brand name Hemlibra®
Pharm. company Roche Pharma AG
G-BA Procedure ID D-426
ATC code B02BX06 Other systemic hemostatics (B02BX)
ICD-10 codes (AIS) D66Hereditary factor VIII deficiency
Alpha-ID codes (AIS) I27819Hemophilia A
DDD 15 mg P
Therapeutic area Hematopoietic diseases Hemophilia (Hemophilia A /Hemophilia B)
Reason for procedure New therapeutic indication

Therapeutic indication of the resolution

Hemlibra is indicated for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in patients with ● severe haemophilia A (congenital factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1%) without factor VIII inhibitors. Hemlibra can be used in all age groups.

Subpopulation Indication Comparator
A) Patients of all ages with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors who are eligible for routine prophylaxis. Plasmatic or recombinant blood coagulation factor VIII preparations used as routine prophylaxis

Studies and Results

No. of studies
(best subpopulation)
2 (Haven-3, Spinart)
Study design
(best subpopulation)
H2H vs. non-ACT + ITC (Bucher)
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation)
no

  • Clinical trials
    • The HAVEN 3 study is an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study with three randomised arms and one non-randomised arm.
    • The SPINART study is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study comparing routine prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII preparations (Octocog alfa) with on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VIII preparations (Octocog alfa).

Patients with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors who are eligible for routine prophylaxis

  • For patients with severe haemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency, FVIII < 1 %) without factor VIII inhibitors, the additional benefit of emicizumab as routine prophylaxis compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
  • The additional benefit compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is therefore not proven.
  • Morbidity – number of treated bleeds
    • The results of the adjusted, indirect comparison of bleeding events were taken into account to estimate the differences in annualised bleeding rates.
    • These show no statistically significant differences between routine prophylaxis with emicizumab and prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII preparation, neither for all treated bleeds nor for treated joint bleeds.
    • However, these data on bleeding rates allow conclusions to be drawn solely regarding morbidity.
  • Furthermore, no usable data are available for the quality of life category, for other morbidity endpoints, or for mortality.
  • Conclusion
    • It is not possible, on the basis of the data presented, to weigh up any additional benefit or less benefit against the appropriate comparator therapy; consequently, no additional benefit over and above the appropriate comparator therapy can be inferred.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures

Emicizumab (3) Hemlibra® Roche Pharma AG Hematopoietic diseases Moderate haemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors, with severe bleeding phenotype 220–240 100% additional benefit not proven
Emicizumab (2) Hemlibra® Roche Pharma AG Hematopoietic diseases Hemophilia A, without factor VIII inhibitors 2,000 100% additional benefit not proven
Emicizumab (1) Hemlibra® Roche Pharma AG Hematopoietic diseases Hemophilia A 100 50% Hint for non-quantifiable additional benefit


<< List of all resolutions