Durvalumab (8) – Imfinzi®
Primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel; maintenance therapy, combination with olaparib
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.09.2024 – Marketing authorisation: 26.07.2024 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 20.02.2025 |
| INN | Durvalumab |
| Brand name | Imfinzi® |
| Pharm. company | AstraZeneca GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-1096 |
| ATC code | L01FF03 PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors (L01FF) |
| Therapeutic area | Oncological diseases |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Specialty | Bundling |
Studies and Results
a) Female patients with newly diagnosed disease
- The conclusion is that, for the group of patients with a newly diagnosed disease, durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab and olaparib, provides considerable additional benefit.
- The certainty of the evidence for the identified additional benefit is classified as an ‘indication’.
- mortality
- For the endpoint of overall survival, a statistically significant advantage was observed in the patient population of patients with newly diagnosed disease for durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab and olaparib.
- The extent of the prolongation in overall survival achieved is assessed as a marked improvement.
- Morbidity – Dyspnoea
- For the endpoint of dyspnoea (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30), a statistically significant disadvantage was observed with durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab plus olaparib.
- Morbidity – loss of appetite
- For the endpoint of loss of appetite (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30), there was a statistically significant disadvantage compared to durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab plus olaparib.
- Morbidity – constipation
- For the endpoint of constipation (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30), there was a statistically significant difference in favor of durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab plus olaparib.
- Morbidity – Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups for symptoms assessed using the PGIS.
- Health-related quality of life – Cognitive functioning
- For the endpoint of cognitive functioning (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30), there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
- Side effects – severe adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3)
- For the endpoint of severe adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
- Side effects – Anaemia (severe adverse events)
- For the endpoint of anaemia (severe adverse events), there was a statistically significant disadvantage for durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab and olaparib, compared with placebo in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by placebo.
- Overall assessment
- In the overall analysis, the clear advantage in terms of overall survival is offset by moderate disadvantages in endpoints within the morbidity category.
- These disadvantages do not call into question the extent of the improvement in overall survival.
- No difference relevant to the benefit assessment was identified for the endpoint categories of health-related quality of life and side effects.
b) Patients with recurrent disease
- Consequently, no additional benefit is identified for durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab and olaparib, in patients with recurrent disease.
- mortality
- In the patient population with recurrent disease, no statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment arms; consequently, no advantage can be inferred here.
- Morbidity – Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups in terms of symptoms assessed using the PGIS.
- Health-related quality of life – Cognitive functioning
- For the endpoint of cognitive functioning (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30), there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
- Side effects – severe adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3)
- For the endpoint of severe adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups.
- Side effects – Anaemia (severe adverse events)
- For the endpoint of anaemia (severe adverse events), there was a statistically significant disadvantage for durvalumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab and olaparib, compared with placebo in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by placebo.
- Overall assessment
- Overall, no differences relevant to the benefit assessment were observed in the endpoint categories of overall survival, health-related quality of life and side effects.
- With regard to morbidity, moderate disadvantages are observed.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
<< List of all resolutions