Bimekizumab (5) – Bimzelx®
Hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa))
Characteristics
| Start date | 01.06.2024 – Marketing authorisation: 19.04.2024 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 22.11.2024 |
| INN | Bimekizumab |
| Brand name | Bimzelx® |
| Pharm. company | UCB Pharma GmbH |
| G-BA Procedure ID | D-1060 |
| ATC code | L04AC21 Interleukin inhibitors (L04AC) |
| ICD-10 codes (AIS) | L73.2Hidradenitis suppurativa |
| Alpha-ID codes (AIS) | I6373Hidradenitis suppurativa |
| Therapeutic area | Skin diseases Hidradenitis suppurativa (Acne inversa) |
| Reason for procedure | New therapeutic indication |
| Therapeutic indication of the resolution |
|---|
|
Bimzelx is used to treat adult patients with active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) who have had an inadequate response to conventional systemic HS therapy. |
| Subpopulation | Indication | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) who have had an inadequate response to conventional systemic HS therapy | Adalimumab or secukinumab |
Studies and Results
|
No. of studies
(best subpopulation) |
2 (BE HEARD I, BE HEARD) 0 (Data not accepted) |
|---|---|
|
Study design
(best subpopulation) |
Data not accepted (Dossier: H2H vs. non-ACT + no ITC) |
- Clinical trials
- In the BE HEARD I and BE HEARD II registration trials, which were supplemented by the pharmaceutical manufacturer, a randomised comparison of bimekizumab versus placebo was conducted over 16 weeks.
Adults with active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) who have an inadequate response to conventional systemic HS therapy
- For adults with active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa who respond inadequately to conventional systemic HS therapy, the additional benefit of bimekizumab compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
- The additional benefit of bimekizumab compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
- For adult patients with active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa who have responded inadequately to conventional systemic HS therapy, no direct comparative studies of bimekizumab versus the appropriate comparator therapy are available.
- Furthermore, no indirect comparison has been presented.
- No conclusions regarding the additional benefit of bimekizumab compared with the appropriate comparator therapy can be drawn from these studies.
- Overall, therefore, there are no data available that are suitable for a benefit assessment.
- Overall assessment
- On balance, the additional benefit of bimekizumab compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.
Associated procedures
| Bimekizumab (5) | Bimzelx® | UCB Pharma GmbH | Hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa)) | 2,800–6,400 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Bimekizumab (2) | Bimzelx® | UCB Pharma GmbH | Psoriatic arthritis, monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate | 30,300 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Bimekizumab (3) | Bimzelx® | UCB Pharma GmbH | Ankylosing spondylitis | 16,800 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Bimekizumab (4) | Bimzelx® | UCB Pharma GmbH | Axial spondyloarthritis, non-radiographic | 19,500 | 100% additional benefit not proven | |
| Bimekizumab (1) | Bimzelx® | UCB Pharma GmbH | Plaque psoriasis (PP) | 35,900–121,500 | 100% Indication of minor additional benefit |
<< List of all resolutions