Bedaquilin (4) – Sirturo®

Multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, 5 to 11 years

Characteristics

Start date 01.04.2021 – Marketing authorisation: 29.03.2021
Resolution 16.09.2021
INN Bedaquilin
Brand name Sirturo®
Pharm. company Janssen-Cilag GmbH
G-BA Procedure ID D-672
ATC code J04AK05 Other drugs for treatment of tuberculosis (J04AK)
ICD-10 codes (AIS) A15.0Tuberculous bronchiectasis, A15.1, A15.2, A15.3, A15.7Primary respiratory tuberculosis, A16.0, A16.1, A16.2, A16.7
Alpha-ID codes (AIS) I100800Primary pulmonary tuberculosis, bacteriologically or histologically confirmed, I111144Sputum positive tuberculosis, I14573Pulmonary tuberculosis, I29285Pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed by culture, I29286Histologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, I29287Confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, I29293Bacteriologically and histologically unconfirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, I93929Primary pulmonary tuberculosis, I94022Bacteriologically and histologically unexamined pulmonary tuberculosis
ORPHAcodes (AIS) 645814Primary pulmonary tuberculosis, bacteriologically or histologically confirmed, 3389Sputum positive tuberculosis, 3389Pulmonary tuberculosis, 3389Pulmonary tuberculosis confirmed by culture, 3389Histologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, 3389Confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, 3389Bacteriologically and histologically unconfirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, 645814Primary pulmonary tuberculosis, 3389Bacteriologically and histologically unexamined pulmonary tuberculosis
DDD 86 mg O
Therapeutic area Infectious diseases Tuberculosis (TB) Orphan
Reason for procedure New therapeutic indication
Regulatory status Exceptional Circumstances Conditional Approval
Specialty Special practice conditions Combination therapy

Therapeutic indication of the resolution

SIRTURO is indicated for use as part of an appropriate combination regimen for pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in adult and paediatric patients (5 years to less than 18 years of age and weighing at least 15 kg) when an effective treatment regimen cannot otherwise be composed for reasons of resistance or tolerability.

Subpopulation Indication Comparator
Children (aged 5 years to less than 12 years and weighing at least 15 kg) with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis when an effective treatment regimen cannot be established other than with bedaquiline (as part of an appropriate combination therapy) due to resistance or intolerance. – (Orphan drug)

Studies and Results

No. of studies
(best subpopulation)
1 (C211)
Study design
(best subpopulation)
Single-arm + no comparison
Meta analysis
(best subpopulation)
no

Children (aged 5 years to under 12 years and weighing at least 15 kg) with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, where an effective treatment regimen cannot be formulated other than with bedaquiline (as part of a suitable combination therapy) due to resistance or intolerance

  • For bedaquiline as part of an appropriate combination therapy, in children (aged 5 years to under 12 years and weighing at least 15 kg) with MDR-TB, where an effective treatment regimen cannot be established other than with bedaquiline due to resistance or intolerance, there is a hint of a non-quantifiable additional benefit, as the scientific data do not permit quantification.
  • Due to a lack of comparative data, the short study duration and the high potential for bias in the single-arm C211 study, the G-BA classifies the extent of the additional benefit of bedaquiline, based on the criteria in Section 5(7) of the AM-NutzenV, taking into account the severity of the disease, the written submissions and the oral hearing.
  • Consequently, a quantitative assessment of the extent of the effect and a quantification of the additional benefit into one of the categories ‘minor’, ‘considerable’ or ‘major’ is not possible on the basis of the data submitted.
  • mortality
    • No deaths occurred in cohort 2 of the C211 study.
  • Morbidity – Resolution of clinical TB symptoms
    • The resolution of TB symptoms was to be assessed by the medical trial staff in accordance with a consensus statement.
    • Although an external assessment of symptoms is not in itself relevant to the patient, the resolution of TB symptoms represents a relevant aspect of recovery.
    • At week 24, this was summarised as ‘completely resolved’, ‘partially resolved’ and ‘not resolved’, although it remains unclear exactly how this categorisation was arrived at.
    • A standardised procedure with predefined criteria for classification was not envisaged for this multicentre study.
    • The systematic recording of individual symptoms in the eCRFs was only introduced retrospectively with Amendment 5 to the study protocol.
    • According to the pharmaceutical manufacturer, the symptoms were recorded prior to this protocol amendment; however, baseline data are not available for all patients.
    • Due to the unclear operationalisation, the endpoint cannot be assessed.
  • Morbidity – absence of pathogens in sputum
    • In study C211, only individuals with confirmed MDR-TB and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)-assayable samples were evaluated for the endpoint ‘absence of pathogens in sputum’ during the course of the study.
    • The operationalisation of the endpoint in the study required the demonstration of freedom from the pathogen through two consecutive negative microbiological sputum cultures taken at a minimum interval of 25 days.
    • The German S2k guideline on the treatment of tuberculosis recommends three negative microscopic sputum samples before repealing isolation.
    • The absence of the pathogen is a fundamental prerequisite for the repeal of isolation, as the risk of transmission no longer exists.
    • The duration of patient isolation affects quality of life and is of relevance to patients.
    • However, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has not collected data on either quality of life or hospitalisation.
    • The duration of isolation depends not only on the absence of the pathogen but also on other factors.
    • It is therefore questionable to what extent the endpoint ‘time to pathogen-free status’ alone, as operationalised here, can provide information on the actual duration of patient isolation.
    • In view of the uncertainties regarding patient relevance and the other limitations mentioned, the endpoint of pathogen-free status in sputum cannot be assessed as a whole and is presented for supplementary information only.
  • quality of life
    • Data on quality of life were not collected as part of the C211 study.
  • Side effects
    • Adverse events (AEs) were recorded both for the 24-week treatment phase with bedaquiline + BR and for the entire study duration (24-week treatment phase (bedaquiline + BR) + follow-up phase (BR only)) up to the data cut-off date of 10 January 2019), with a median observation period of over 61 weeks.
    • Approximately 53% of participants experienced AEs of grade ≥ 3, and approximately 13% experienced serious AEs.
    • AE of particular interest occurred in approximately 53% of participants, including hepatotoxicity in approximately 20% and liver-related coagulation and bleeding disorders (prolonged prothrombin time) in approximately 33%.
    • In approximately 20% of participants, AEs led to discontinuation of bedaquiline therapy, and in approximately 27%, AEs led to discontinuation of at least one drug in the background therapy.
  • Overall assessment
    • For bedaquiline as part of an appropriate combination therapy for the treatment of children (aged 5 years to under 12 years and weighing at least 15 kg) with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-TB), where an effective treatment regimen cannot be formulated without bedaquiline due to resistance or intolerance, results on mortality, morbidity and side effects are available based on Cohort 2 of the C211 study.
    • No deaths occurred in the C211 study.
    • In the morbidity endpoint category, the endpoints ‘absence of the pathogen in sputum’ and ‘resolution of TB symptoms (assessed by medical study staff)’ were recorded.
    • Due to limitations regarding operationalisation, the single-arm study design, the minor number of cases and the short observation period of 24 weeks for this therapeutic indication in the available data set, the endpoints cannot be assessed.
    • In summary, no conclusions regarding the extent of the additional benefit can be drawn from the morbidity data.
    • Furthermore, no data on quality of life were collected.
    • In summary, no conclusions regarding the extent of the additional benefit can be drawn from the data on side effects.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures



<< List of all resolutions