Aflibercept (5) – Eylea®

Myopic choroidal neovascularisation

Characteristics

Start date 01.12.2015 – Marketing authorisation: 28.10.2015
Resolution 19.05.2016
INN Aflibercept
Brand name Eylea®
Pharm. company Bayer Vital GmbH
G-BA Procedure ID D-197
ATC code S01LA05 Antineovascularisation agents (S01LA)
DDD 20 mg P
Therapeutic area Eye diseases
Reason for procedure New therapeutic indication

Studies and Results

  • Clinical trials
    • The MYRROR registration trial for aflibercept (for the treatment of visual impairment due to myopic CNV) was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase III clinical trial.
    • The target population for the trial was adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) due to pathological myopia (PM). At the start of the trial, the treatment arm received a single intravitreal injection of aflibercept, followed by monthly follow-up injections as required, whilst the control arm received intravitreal sham injections.

Adults for the treatment of visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularisation (myopic CNV)

  • For patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularisation (myopic CNV), additional benefit is not proven.
  • The pharmaceutical manufacturer has not submitted any study to assess the additional benefit of aflibercept compared with the G-BA’s appropriate comparator therapy (ranibizumab).
  • This is because the G-BA’s appropriate comparator therapy was not used in any study.
  • Furthermore, the pharmaceutical manufacturer has not identified any study for a possible indirect comparison.
  • The G-BA cannot take the MYRROR study into account because ‘sham injections’ do not constitute the appropriate comparator therapy.
  • On the basis of the information in the dossier, the IQWiG’s benefit assessment and the comments on the benefit assessment, the G-BA concludes that the additional benefit of aflibercept over the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.
  • Morbidity – improvement in visual acuity with best possible correction
    • The primary endpoint examined was the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity over a period of 24 weeks.
  • Conclusion
    • On the basis of the information in the dossier, the IQWiG’s benefit assessment and the comments on the benefit assessment, the G-BA concludes that additional benefit from aflibercept compared with the appropriate comparator therapy is not proven.

Courtesy translation only, please refer to the German original.

Associated procedures



<< List of all resolutions